User talk:Alooulla
Hello, Alooulla, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 13:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
Question for administrator
[edit] | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
This is in regard to Battle of Le Cateau, and the talk page therein. I feel the user Keith-264 is over-protective of this article. He constantly reverts my edits (usually immediately) and refuses to allow my attempts to add context to a much debated historical event. He seems to have chosen a point of view to follow and sticks to it, allowing no attempts to add other, conflicting information to the page, even when backed up by historical sources. Conflicting information for this page is paramount, because as mentioned the battle is still hotly debated, and I am not being allowed to add any changes whatsoever; in fact, if you examine the talk page, you will see that I have consistently tried to work with this user, but all my attempts are being brushed off as either essay writing or biased. They have remained pleasant and outwardly helpful, but I strongly suspect at this point they are showing poor faith. You will see the article allows speculation when suited to their purpose, but dismisses other speculation as unacceptable.
As I say they are being outwardly pleasant but I feel they are being overprotective of 'their' article, and any advice you can give me would be deeply appreciated, as I think the article as it stands is a gross misrepresentation of an important historical event. Thank you.
--Alooulla (talk) 19:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- If discussion with the user has not resolved your concerns about the article, you should move to dispute resolution processes. If you have issues with the other user's behavior, you may start a discussion at WP:ANI(but be advised that your own actions will be examined as well, it is not a one way street). 331dot (talk) 20:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. I am confident in my own actions (and indeed would accept a resolution not in my favour) but I just cannot get it out of my head that something inappropriate is going on here and I am being gaslit. Alooulla (talk) 20:56, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 2
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rowland Hill, 1st Viscount Hill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)